Nonadherence to Immunosuppressant Therapy of Kidney Transplant Candidate Patients: External Validation of the KATITA-25 Scale.

BACKGROUND: The self-administered Kidney AlloTransplant Immunosuppressive Therapy Adherence (KATITA-25) questionnaire is a multidimensional scale for use in the pretransplant setting that evaluates the predisposition to nonadherence of patients who are candidates to kidney transplant. The scale has shown adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. This study presents the results of an external validation study of the KATITA-25 scale. METHODS: Patients >18 y old scheduled for kidney transplant were included in this multicenter study. The KATITA-25 scale was administered before surgery and then at 3-mo posttransplantation for evaluation of scale sensitivity to change. At this time, 2 validated medication adherence scales were applied for assessment of concurrent validity. For evaluation of predictive validity, nonadherence to immunosuppressive medication was assessed at 6 and 12 mo after transplantation by 3 independent methods: patient self-report of nonadherence using the Morisky-Green-Levine Medication Assessment Questionnaire scale, serum trough levels of immunosuppressants, and pharmacy refills. RESULTS: Three twenty-two patients were available for evaluation of concurrent validity and 311 patients of predictive validity. After kidney transplant, the median KATITA-25 score decreased from 20 to 8 (P < 0.001), demonstrating scale sensitivity to change, and the KATITA-25 score showed correlation with the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale score (Spearman's ρ 0.18, P = 0.002) and the Cuestionario para la Evaluación de la Adhesión al Tratamiento Antiretroviral scores (ρ -0.17, P = 0.002), confirming concurrent validity. The nonadherence rate was 57.6%. The scale predictive validity was demonstrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.68), sensitivity (59.8%), specificity (68.2%), and positive predictive value (71.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This external validation study of KATITA-25 scale provided evidence of sensitivity to change, and structural, criterion, and predictive validity.

Actions developed at the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira to confront the COVID-19 pandemic / Ações desenvolvidas no Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira para enfrentamento à pandemia da COVID-19

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has brought countless challenges to the health institutions around the world, especially those located in countries such as Brazil, with large territorial dimensions and many social and economic differences. This technical report aims to publish the actions carried out and the products developed at the Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) before and during the pandemic - from January 31st to September 4th, 2020 - facing it efficiently and effectively, seeking institutional sustainability. The mobilization of the professional staff at the institution was fundamental to create protocols ofas-sistance, adapt the physical structures in the hospital and outpatient care, care for the health professionals, offer teaching and research activities in the distance mode, articulate management members to make decisions based on systematically collected data on the pandemic situationat real time. All actions were carried out with a single objective of assisting all the patients affected by COVID-19 admitted at the institution.

Resumo A pandemia da COVID-19 trouxe incontáveis desafios para as instituições de saúde de todo o mundo, em especial as localizadas em países como o Brasil, com grande dimensão territorial e muitas diferenças sociais e econômicas. Este informe técnico tem como objetivo publicizar as ações realizadas e os produtos desenvolvidos no Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) antes e durante a pandemia - no período de 31 de janeiro até 04 de setembro de 2020 - enfrentando-a com eficiência e eficácia, buscando a sustentabilidade institucional. A mobilização do corpo profissional da instituição foi fundamental para a construir protocolos de atendimento, adaptar as estruturas físicas na assistência ao paciente em âmbito hospitalar e ambulatorial, cuidar dos profissionais de saúde, ofertar as atividades de ensino e pesquisa na modalidade à distância, articular os membros da gestão para tomar decisões baseadas em dados sistematicamente coletados sobre a situação da pandemia em tempo real. Todas as ações foram realizadas com um uníssono objetivo de atender a todos os pacientes acometidos pela COVID-19 admitidos na instituição.